Drug types: Difference between revisions

From Jaf's Wiki
(First issue)
 
mNo edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
|rowspan="2"|Design and Manufacture
|rowspan="2"|Design and Manufacture
|Design
|Design
|They have '''large complex structures''' with intricate folds held together by weaker non-covalent bonds. ''Typically 20-100 atoms.''
|They have '''large complex structures''' with intricate folds held together by weaker non-covalent bonds. ''Can have 1000’s or even 10,000s of atoms.''
|They have '''small simpler structures''' with mostly fewer and stronger covalent bonds. ''Can have 1000’s or even 10,000s of atoms.''
|They have '''small simpler structures''' with mostly fewer and stronger covalent bonds. ''Typically 20-100 atoms.''
|-
|-
|Manufacture
|Manufacture
Line 28: Line 28:
|-
|-
|Side effects
|Side effects
|'''Lower toxicity and side effects.''' Their bespoke complex structure results in high selectivity, binding mostly to just what they're designed to.
|'''Lower toxicity and side effects.''' Their bespoke complex structure results in high selectivity, binding mostly to just what they're intended to.
|'''Greater toxicity and side effects.''' Their smaller and simpler structure results in lower selectivity, interacting and binding with more unintentional off-target sites.
|'''Greater toxicity and side effects.''' Their smaller and simpler structure results in lower selectivity, interacting and binding with more unintentional off-target sites.
|-
|-
|Storage
|Storage
|Their large delicate structure make them '''sensitive to physical conditions''' (temperature, shear stress, light etc.).
|Their large and delicate structure make them '''sensitive to physical conditions''' (temperature, shear stress, light etc.).
|Their small structure, mostly composed of strong covalent bonds, makes them more robust and '''less sensitive to physical conditions.'''
|Their small structure, mostly composed of strong covalent bonds, makes them more robust and '''less sensitive to physical conditions.'''
|-
|-
Line 49: Line 49:
|-
|-
|}
|}
[[Category:Drugs]]

Latest revision as of 23:32, 21 September 2023

Types

There are broadly two types of drugs. Biologics (aka. Large Molecules) and Small Molecules.

Drug molecule comparison. Biologic left, Small molecule right

Comparison

General characteristics of biologic and small molecule drugs
Biologics Small Molecules
Design and Manufacture Design They have large complex structures with intricate folds held together by weaker non-covalent bonds. Can have 1000’s or even 10,000s of atoms. They have small simpler structures with mostly fewer and stronger covalent bonds. Typically 20-100 atoms.
Manufacture Made by a complex bioprocess using living organisms. Made by simpler chemical synthesis.
Effectiveness Efficacy Revolutionary, especially for chronic hard-to-treat diseases (e.g. cancer and autoimmune diseases). Medications exist for both acute and chronic diseases.
Side effects Lower toxicity and side effects. Their bespoke complex structure results in high selectivity, binding mostly to just what they're intended to. Greater toxicity and side effects. Their smaller and simpler structure results in lower selectivity, interacting and binding with more unintentional off-target sites.
Storage Their large and delicate structure make them sensitive to physical conditions (temperature, shear stress, light etc.). Their small structure, mostly composed of strong covalent bonds, makes them more robust and less sensitive to physical conditions.
Administration Injected, therefore less patient friendly. Their complex and fragile folded structure cant survive the digestive tract, and their large structure cant be absorbed through it either. Swallowed/Inhaled/Absorbed through the skin, therefore more patient friendly. Their small and stable structure is often able to survive the digestive tract, and they can be absorbed through it too.
Business Market size Minority of drugs. Relatively novel but are becoming increasingly common. Majority of drugs currently on the market.
Cost Extremely expensive. Complex to design, manufacture, and administer. Furthermore, on patent expiry, they are still challenging manufacture, with biosimilars only reducing cost by tens of percent. Cheap. Simpler to design, manufacture and administer. Furthermore, after patent expiry, they are easier to copy, with generics often reducing cost by an order of magnitude.